Match statistics snapshot
- Sevilla created the clearer chances on xG (0.30 vs 1.04, Δ 0.74).
- Athletic Club fired more attempts (6 vs 4 shots).
- Sevilla was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Sevilla |
|---|---|---|
| 0.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.04Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 1Lead |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Sevilla |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 332Lead | Accurate passes | 263 |
| 453Lead | Total passes | 368 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Sevilla |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Sevilla |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club | Statistic | Sevilla |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.