Match statistics snapshot
- Madrid CFF W fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Madrid CFF W was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 29%).
- Madrid CFF W held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Athletic Club W | Statistic | Madrid Cff W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Athletic Club W | Statistic | Madrid Cff W |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 213 | Accurate passes | 378Lead |
| 327 | Total passes | 490Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Athletic Club W | Statistic | Madrid Cff W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Athletic Club W | Statistic | Madrid Cff W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Athletic Club W | Statistic | Madrid Cff W |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.