Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 2.11, Δ 0.99).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (22 vs 10 shots).
- Atlanta United FC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.11Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 403 | Accurate passes | 417Lead |
| 470 | Total passes | 471Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |