Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 1.46, Δ 0.54).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0.92 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.46Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 425Lead | Accurate passes | 279 |
| 499Lead | Total passes | 351 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |