Match statistics snapshot
- Atlanta United FC created the clearer chances on xG (3.63 vs 1.60, Δ 2.03).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (29 vs 12 shots).
- Atlanta United FC was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 34%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 14Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 29Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 293 | Accurate passes | 531Lead |
| 356 | Total passes | 588Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.39 | Goals prevented | -0.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |