Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 1.30, Δ 0.35).
- Atlanta United FC fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Atlanta United FC was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.30Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 357 | Accurate passes | 553Lead |
| 421 | Total passes | 623Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.46 | Goals prevented | -0.46 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atlanta United Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |