Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atlas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atlas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 256 | Accurate passes | 364Lead |
| 343 | Total passes | 457Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atlas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atlas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atlas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.