Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Grau fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- UTC Cajamarca was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
- UTC Cajamarca held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Grau | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Grau | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 425Lead |
| 286 | Total passes | 505Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Grau | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Grau | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Grau | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.