Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Madrid created the clearer chances on xG (1.78 vs 0.85, Δ 0.93).
- Atletico Madrid fired more attempts (23 vs 8 shots).
- Atletico Madrid was more accurate in front of goal (26% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Madrid | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
1.78Lead | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 0.85 |
2 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1Lead |
16Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
9Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
23Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 8 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Madrid | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
488Lead | Accurate passes | 383 |
555Lead | Total passes | 464 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Madrid | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Madrid | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
8Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 2 |
0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
-0.08 | Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. | -0.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Madrid | Statistic | Alaves |
|---|---|---|
13 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Alaves leads this block
Alaves leads shot quality (+37% vs Atletico Madrid)
Atletico Madrid leads (26% vs 0%).
Alaves leads shot quality (+37% vs Atletico Madrid)
Alaves leads (75% vs 70%).
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Atletico Madrid leads this block
Atletico Madrid leads possession efficiency (+78% vs Alaves)
Atletico Madrid leads possession efficiency (+78% vs Alaves)
Alaves — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Atletico Madrid leads this block
Atletico Madrid leads territorial pressure (+160% vs Alaves)
Atletico Madrid leads territorial pressure (+160% vs Alaves)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Alaves leads this block
Alaves — stronger shot quality allowed
Alaves — stronger shot quality allowed
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Atletico Madrid leads this block
Atletico Madrid had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.
Atletico Madrid leads (15.0 vs 7.0).
Atletico Madrid leads (47.5 vs 38.2).
Atletico Madrid leads (22.0 vs 12.0).
Alaves leads (0.106 vs 0.077).
Alaves leads (92.3 vs 89.4).
Atletico Madrid leads (22.0 vs 8.0).