Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico-MG created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 1.12, Δ 0.08).
- Atletico-MG fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico-mg | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico-mg | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 324 | Accurate passes | 394Lead |
| 394 | Total passes | 452Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico-mg | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico-mg | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico-mg | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |