Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico-MG created the clearer chances on xG (3.37 vs 0.16, Δ 3.21).
- Atletico-MG fired more attempts (25 vs 4 shots).
- Atletico-MG was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico-mg | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 3.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.16 |
| Offsides | ||
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico-mg | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 435Lead | Accurate passes | 187 |
| 503Lead | Total passes | 263 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico-mg | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico-mg | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.93 | Goals prevented | 1.93 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico-mg | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |