Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Cavalry FC was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atlético Ottawa | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atlético Ottawa | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 279 | Accurate passes | 458Lead |
| 370 | Total passes | 536Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atlético Ottawa | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atlético Ottawa | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atlético Ottawa | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.