Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 38%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico San Luis | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico San Luis | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 129 | Accurate passes | 417Lead |
| 204 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico San Luis | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico San Luis | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico San Luis | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |