Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico San Luis created the clearer chances on xG (0.87 vs 0.44, Δ 0.43).
- Atletico San Luis fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico San Luis | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 0.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico San Luis | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 358 | Accurate passes | 410Lead |
| 439 | Total passes | 489Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico San Luis | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico San Luis | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico San Luis | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |