Match statistics snapshot
- Palestino created the clearer chances on xG (0.25 vs 1.12, Δ 0.87).
- Palestino fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Atletico Torque was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Torque | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Torque | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 180 | Accurate passes | 331Lead |
| 276 | Total passes | 422Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Torque | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Torque | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.74 | Goals prevented | -0.74 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Torque | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.