Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Tucuman fired more attempts (25 vs 7 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 24%).
- Atletico Tucuman held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 55% |
| 299Lead | Accurate passes | 102 |
| 375Lead | Total passes | 185 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.