Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Tucuman fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Atletico Tucuman was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 20%).
- Atletico Tucuman held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 280Lead | Accurate passes | 232 |
| 373Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.