Match statistics snapshot
- Independ.
- Rivadavia created the clearer chances on xG (0.26 vs 1.15, Δ 0.89).
- Independ.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 0.26 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 153 | Accurate passes | 278Lead |
| 227 | Total passes | 353Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.06 | Goals prevented | 0.06 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Independ. Rivadavia |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.