Match statistics snapshot
- Instituto Cordoba created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 1.41, Δ 0.16).
- Atletico Tucuman fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Atletico Tucuman held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.41Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 67%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 232Lead | Accurate passes | 197 |
| 348Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Corner kicks | 9 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.89 | Goals prevented | 0.89 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |