Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Tucuman created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 0.96, Δ 0.13).
- Atletico Tucuman fired more attempts (19 vs 6 shots).
- Platense was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Platense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Platense |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 57% |
| 392Lead | Accurate passes | 165 |
| 503Lead | Total passes | 289 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Platense |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Platense |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.62 | Goals prevented | -0.62 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Platense |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |