Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Atletico Tucuman was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 6%).
- River Plate held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 54% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 136 | Accurate passes | 383Lead |
| 252 | Total passes | 502Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.