Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Tucuman fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
- River Plate held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 189 | Accurate passes | 414Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 506Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.