Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Tucuman created the clearer chances on xG (1.59 vs 0.60, Δ 0.99).
- River Plate fired more attempts (18 vs 17 shots).
- Atletico Tucuman was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 1.59Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 14Lead |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 180 | Accurate passes | 397Lead |
| 251 | Total passes | 489Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.49 | Goals prevented | 0.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.