Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Tucuman created the clearer chances on xG (1.32 vs 0.24, Δ 1.08).
- Atletico Tucuman fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Atletico Tucuman was more accurate in front of goal (21% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Rosario Central |
|---|---|---|
| 1.32Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.24 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Rosario Central |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 230 | Accurate passes | 282Lead |
| 308 | Total passes | 373Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Rosario Central |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Rosario Central |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.81 | Goals prevented | 0.81 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Rosario Central |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |