Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Tucuman created the clearer chances on xG (1.71 vs 0.29, Δ 1.42).
- Atletico Tucuman fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Atletico Tucuman was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 1.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.29 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8 | Shots off target | 8 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 235Lead | Accurate passes | 170 |
| 333Lead | Total passes | 266 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.16 | Goals prevented | 1.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Atletico Tucuman | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |