Match statistics snapshot
- Melbourne City created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 1.55, Δ 0.36).
- Auckland was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 24%).
- Melbourne City held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Auckland | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.55Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Auckland | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 316 | Accurate passes | 374Lead |
| 466 | Total passes | 518Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Auckland | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Auckland | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Auckland | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.