Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 2.56, Δ 1.43).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.56Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 366Lead | Accurate passes | 308 |
| 450Lead | Total passes | 396 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.