Match statistics snapshot
- Austin created the clearer chances on xG (2.24 vs 1.79, Δ 0.45).
- Austin fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 2.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.79 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 540Lead | Accurate passes | 236 |
| 614Lead | Total passes | 291 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.00 | Goals prevented | -1.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |