Match statistics snapshot
- Austin created the clearer chances on xG (0.93 vs 0.66, Δ 0.27).
- Austin fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Houston Dynamo was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 363 | Accurate passes | 465Lead |
| 427 | Total passes | 508Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.62 | Goals prevented | -0.62 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |