Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.26 vs 0.97, Δ 0.71).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (14 vs 3 shots).
- Austin was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.26 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 280 | Accurate passes | 458Lead |
| 353 | Total passes | 528Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| -0.50 | Goals prevented | -0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |