Match statistics snapshot
- Austin created the clearer chances on xG (0.47 vs 0.29, Δ 0.18).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (5 vs 3 shots).
- Austin was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.29 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 5Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 396 | Accurate passes | 504Lead |
| 452 | Total passes | 562Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.12 | Goals prevented | 0.12 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.