Match statistics snapshot
- Minnesota United FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.00 vs 3.15, Δ 2.15).
- Minnesota United FC fired more attempts (22 vs 9 shots).
- Minnesota United FC was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.00 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.15Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 304Lead | Accurate passes | 274 |
| 386Lead | Total passes | 363 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 16Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |