Match statistics snapshot
- Austin created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.51, Δ 0.62).
- Austin fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Minnesota United FC was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 480Lead | Accurate passes | 192 |
| 563Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.34 | Goals prevented | 0.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |