Match statistics snapshot
- Austin created the clearer chances on xG (1.71 vs 1.63, Δ 0.08).
- Minnesota United FC fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Austin was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.63 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 419Lead | Accurate passes | 281 |
| 475Lead | Total passes | 355 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.59 | Goals prevented | 0.59 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.