Match statistics snapshot
- Austin created the clearer chances on xG (1.93 vs 1.65, Δ 0.28).
- Austin fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.65 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 419Lead | Accurate passes | 297 |
| 475Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 1.47 | Goals prevented | 1.47 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |