Match statistics snapshot
- New York City FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 1.67, Δ 0.54).
- New York City FC fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Austin was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.67Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 388 | Accurate passes | 474Lead |
| 441 | Total passes | 533Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.09 | Goals prevented | 0.09 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |