Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.52 vs 1.84, Δ 0.32).
- Austin fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Austin held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.84Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 474Lead | Accurate passes | 198 |
| 544Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.