Match statistics snapshot
- Austin created the clearer chances on xG (1.10 vs 0.45, Δ 0.65).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Austin | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Austin | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 348 | Accurate passes | 456Lead |
| 413 | Total passes | 537Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Austin | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Austin | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.18 | Goals prevented | 0.18 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Austin | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.