Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 1.58, Δ 0.91).
- Criciuma fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Criciuma held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Avai | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Avai | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 242 | Accurate passes | 291Lead |
| 318 | Total passes | 376Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Avai | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Avai | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Avai | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |