Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 1.15, Δ 0.58).
- Criciuma fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Avai was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Avai | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Avai | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 278Lead | Accurate passes | 179 |
| 344Lead | Total passes | 245 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Avai | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Avai | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.07 | Goals prevented | -0.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Avai | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 25 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.