Averbode Okselaar 5-0 Diest Prediction

Averbode OkselaarAverbode Okselaar
5 — 0FT
DiestDiest
OverviewLineupsStatisticsStandingsEventsPlayersPredictionsFormInjuriesH2H

Updated

Averbode OkselaarAverbode OkselaarvsDiestDiest

Match DNA · Predictions ↗

Open / transitional — model leans Averbode Okselaar

Estimated win chances: Averbode Okselaar 66.6%, draw 16.9%, Diest 16.5%. From 11 and 11 competition matches.

TempoHigh
VolatilityMedium
Expected goalsHigh
Tactical styleOpen / transitional
Upset potentialLow
Draw riskLow
Model confidenceHigh

Outcome model

Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.

Goal expectancy

2.66Expected goals1.29

From 11 and 11 competition matches

Likely scorelines (Poisson)

  • 2–110.2%
  • 3–19.1%
  • 2–07.9%
  • 1–17.7%
  • 3–07%

Form & momentum

Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.

54BuildingAverbode Okselaar
Weighted momentum

Averbode Okselaar carries the sharper recent run (+53 momentum).

1Cold spellDiest
Averbode Okselaar · leaky defenseDiest · High-risk / fragile

Averbode Okselaar

6W · 2D · 3L
Recent →LWLDWLWWWWD
Momentum index

Diest

0W · 1D · 10L
Recent →LLLLLLLLLDL
Momentum index

Form split comparison

Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window

Season record

League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.

Table gapAverbode Okselaar +19

Averbode Okselaar

20 pts
55% wins

6W · 2D · 3L · 11 played

For
26
Against
22
Goal diff +4

Diest

1 pts
0% wins

0W · 1D · 10L · 11 played

For
10
Against
37
Goal diff -27

Season shape comparison

League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals

League depth signals

Extremes, discipline windows, and split stats from the full league profile.

Matchup edges

Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.

  • Averbode Okselaar offensive edge

    Averbode Okselaar's attack (67%) vs Diest's defense (36%).

    +31
  • Diest offensive edge

    Diest runs into a stronger home defensive profile.

    -31

Team comparison

Comparison indices from the match data partner.

Attack rating

Attacking threat in the final third.

Averbode Okselaar67
Diest33

Defense rating

How well each side limits chances.

Averbode Okselaar64
Diest36

Momentum

Weighted form score (recent results count more).

Averbode Okselaar54
Diest1

Matchup edge

Attack vs opponent defense (positive = favourable matchup).

Averbode Okselaar112
Diest-12

Volatility

Higher = more swingy results (big losses, goals against).

Averbode Okselaar41
Diest72

Form index

Head-to-head form comparison from the model.

Averbode Okselaar100
Diest0

H2H pull

Historical dominance in recent meetings.

Averbode Okselaar0
Diest0
Averbode Okselaarleaky defense
DiestHigh-risk / fragile