Match statistics snapshot
- Cerezo Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 0.98, Δ 0.37).
- Cerezo Osaka fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Cerezo Osaka was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 359 | Accurate passes | 493Lead |
| 454 | Total passes | 575Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |