Match statistics snapshot
- Kashima created the clearer chances on xG (0.34 vs 0.82, Δ 0.48).
- Avispa Fukuoka was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 14%).
- Kashima held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 0.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 330 | Total passes | 559Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.