Match statistics snapshot
- Avispa Fukuoka fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Mito Hollyhock was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 31%).
- Mito Hollyhock held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 293 | Accurate passes | 350Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 439Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Additional tracked metrics for this fixture.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Mito Hollyhock |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Free Kicks | 11 |