Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 1.70, Δ 1.18).
- Nagoya Grampus held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 5 |
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 269 | Accurate passes | 331Lead |
| 360 | Total passes | 436Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Avispa Fukuoka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.