Match statistics snapshot
- Arouca created the clearer chances on xG (0.58 vs 1.15, Δ 0.57).
- Arouca fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- AVS was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Avs | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 0.58 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Avs | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 257 | Accurate passes | 523Lead |
| 346 | Total passes | 593Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Avs | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Avs | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.26 | Goals prevented | 0.26 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Avs | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |