Match statistics snapshot
- Casa Pia created the clearer chances on xG (0.88 vs 1.17, Δ 0.29).
- AVS fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Casa Pia was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Avs | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
| 10Lead | Total shots | 6 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Avs | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 140 | Accurate passes | 343Lead |
| 217 | Total passes | 426Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Avs | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Avs | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.29 | Goals prevented | 0.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Avs | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 7 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |