Match statistics snapshot
- AZ Alkmaar created the clearer chances on xG (2.59 vs 0.60, Δ 1.99).
- AZ Alkmaar fired more attempts (27 vs 4 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Az Alkmaar | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 2.59Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60 |
| Offsides | ||
| 22Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Az Alkmaar | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 611Lead | Accurate passes | 163 |
| 704Lead | Total passes | 254 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Az Alkmaar | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Az Alkmaar | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Az Alkmaar | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 6 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |