Match statistics snapshot
- AZ Alkmaar created the clearer chances on xG (2.26 vs 0.15, Δ 2.11).
- AZ Alkmaar fired more attempts (20 vs 2 shots).
- AZ Alkmaar was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Az Alkmaar | Statistic | Zrinjski |
|---|---|---|
| 2.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.15 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Az Alkmaar | Statistic | Zrinjski |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 541Lead | Accurate passes | 166 |
| 622Lead | Total passes | 244 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Az Alkmaar | Statistic | Zrinjski |
|---|---|---|
| 21Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Az Alkmaar | Statistic | Zrinjski |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Az Alkmaar | Statistic | Zrinjski |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.