Match statistics snapshot
- Fakel created the clearer chances on xG (0.56 vs 0.90, Δ 0.34).
- Baltika was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Baltika | Statistic | Fakel |
|---|---|---|
| 0.56 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Baltika | Statistic | Fakel |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 68%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 232Lead | Accurate passes | 217 |
| 341Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Baltika | Statistic | Fakel |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Baltika | Statistic | Fakel |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Baltika | Statistic | Fakel |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.